Legal Opinion
Brust v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 14, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Thomas A. Standee, J.
The defendant, Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company (Mutual of Omaha), submits a motion seeking an order granting summary judgment dismissing the complaint of the plaintiff, Deborah Brust (Brust). The defendant, Continental Casualty Company (Continental), also submits a motion seeking an order granting summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs complaint.
Facts
This action was commenced on October 20, 1998 seeking benefits in the sum of $25,000 under an accidental death and dismemberment policy of insurance issued by Continental and a similar policy issued by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miller v. Continental InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Sperling v. Great American Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Caporino v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Baughman v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hummel v. Continental Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2003
- Dipper v. Union Labor Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- 99 Wall Development Inc. v. Allied World Specialty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021