Legal Opinion · Dissent
E. Osborne Smith, Inc. v. Weiss
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 28, 1947Published
1DissentFttld, J.
In order to succeed in this action, plaintiff broker was under the necessity of proving a contract with defendant that the latter would deal only through it and would refuse to purchase the property through any other broker. In my view, plaintiff has failed to establish such a contract. (Foss v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 217 N. Y. 727; Sieven v. Glazer, 267 App Div 969, leave to appeal denied, 292 N. Y. 726.)
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sieven v. GlazerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Foss v. . the New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916