Legal Opinion
United States v. 1500 Cases, More or Less
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 14, 1957No. Nos. 12021, 12022PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Chief Judge.
The United States filed two libels of information against several carloads of tomato paste charging them to be adulterated within the meaning of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.A. § 334(a)). Pursuant to monitions issued by the District Court, the United States Marshal seized the tomato paste on December 8, 1954 and on January 18, 1955. On those dates the tomato paste was stored in Crooks Terminal Warehouse in Chicago.
The paste was canned in Utah by the Smith Canning Company and was shipped to Chicago, Illinois. By order of the District Court, Smith…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States of America, Libellant-Appellant v. 1,500 Cases More or Less, Tomato PasteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- United States v. French Sardine Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
- United States v. Poling Russell, Inc. The Dover. The Poling Bros. No. 12Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
3Cited by10 opinions
- Robert S. Ortloff v. United States of America, Robert Barrix, Thomas JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Formula One Motors, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Ysasi v. RivkindCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Sterling v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
- United States of America, Libellant-Appellant v. 1500 Cases, More or Less, Etc., Smith Canning Company, Claimant-Appellee. United States of America, Libelant-Appellant v. 1473 Cases, More or Less, Etc., Smith Canning Company, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.