Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Healy

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 1, 1993No. 92-16051PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

The plaintiffs in this case are a class of applicants or recipients for Aid to Families with Dependent Children (“AFDC”) who live in households comprised of two or more non-sibling dependent children and a single caretaker relative, or a relative married couple. *155They challenge regulations of the California Department of Social Services, MPP § 44-205.31 and its successor, § 82-824.1. Those regulations combine into one “assistant unit” or “family budget unit” AFDC recipients in the position of plaintiffs. Plaintiffs contend that the challenged regulations violate federal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bowen v. GilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Beaton v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morrell v. FlahertySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Edwards v. HealyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Bray v. DowlingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API