Legal Opinion

Ex Parte ATM

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 1, 2000No. 1980829Published

1Opinion of the Court

804 So.2d 171 (2000)

Ex parte A.T.M.

(Re A.T.M. v. State).

1980829

Supreme Court of Alabama.

June 30, 2000.

Dissenting Opinion on Overruling of Rehearing September 1, 2000.

William E. Scully, Jr., Daphne, for petitioner.

Bill Pryor, atty. gen., and Thomas F. Parker IV, asst. atty. gen., for respondent.

JOHNSTONE, Justice.

A.T.M. was convicted of two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree for the sexual abuse of C.R. and M.R. in violation of § 13A-6-66(a)(3), Ala.Code 1975; one count of sexual abuse in the second degree for the sexual abuse of T.R. in violation of § 13A-6-67(a)(2); and one count of…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sockwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  2. House v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Vaughn v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. McCoy v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API