Legal Opinion
Gormin v. Brown-Forman Corp.
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided July 11, 1990No. 88-1036-Civ-T-15CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CASTAGNA, District Judge.
The Court now turns attention to the several pending motions in this consolidated age discrimination action.
i.
First to consider is the motion by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission [EEOC] for leave to intervene (D-84). 1 Since filing this motion, the EEOC filed its own lawsuit against the defendant raising the same claims, and the separate suits have been consolidated (D-9 of Case No. 89-1331). Under these circumstances the motion to intervene is moot, as intervention has effectively been accomplished through consolidation.
Consolidation has also…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gormin v. Brown-Forman Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Druffner v. Mrs. Fields, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1992
- 59 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 110, 59 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,558 William B. Gormin, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated, Counterclaim-Defendants-Appellees v. Brown-Forman Corporation, Counterclaim-Plaintiff-Appellant. Jack A. Adams v. Brown-Forman Corporation, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Brown-Forman CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992