Legal Opinion

Daiserman v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided September 15, 1978No. 76-CC-0877Published

1Per curiam

This matter comes before the Court on Claimant’s motion to vacate order of dismissal and Respondent’s objections to said motion.

On July 15,1976, this Court dismissed the original complaint because the complaint was filed over two years after the action accrued and was barred by the limitations imposed by the “Court of Claims Act” (Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 37, sec. 439.22, 1975).

The question is whether the new motion to file an amended complaint on August 25, 1976, comes within the two year limitation imposed by the “Court of Claims Act.”

It is the contention of Claimant that the new motion was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. TromlyIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Wilson v. TromlyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
  3. Munch v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1966
  4. Truitt v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API