Daiserman v. State
Court of Claims of Illinois
1Per curiam
This matter comes before the Court on Claimant’s motion to vacate order of dismissal and Respondent’s objections to said motion.
On July 15,1976, this Court dismissed the original complaint because the complaint was filed over two years after the action accrued and was barred by the limitations imposed by the “Court of Claims Act” (Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 37, sec. 439.22, 1975).
The question is whether the new motion to file an amended complaint on August 25, 1976, comes within the two year limitation imposed by the “Court of Claims Act.”
It is the contention of Claimant that the new motion was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilson v. TromlyIllinois Supreme Court · 1949
- Wilson v. TromlyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
- Munch v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1966
- Truitt v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1958