Legal Opinion

T.L. v. Jack Goldberg, M.D.(081135) (Middlesex County and Statewide)

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 10, 2019No. A-11-18PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fernandez-Vina

**220 In this case, we must determine whether plaintiff T.L. is entitled to a new trial because -- without objection from T.L. -- defendant Jack Goldberg, M.D., gave trial testimony inconsistent with his discovery responses.

In this medical malpractice action, T.L. claims Dr. Goldberg committed malpractice by prescribing a medication that she asserts should not be prescribed to individuals, who, like her, have a history of depression. During discovery, Dr. Goldberg claimed that he did not recall relying upon any medical publications when prescribing the medication to T.L. and, more…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Karen K. Johnson v. Roselle Ez Quick, Llc(075044)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  2. Risko v. Thompson Muller Automotive Group, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  3. Hayes v. DelamotteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
  4. Jackowitz v. LangNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  5. State v. Santino J. Micelli (070453)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. C.R. v. M.T. (083760) (Gloucester County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2021
  2. C.R. v. M.T. (083760) (Gloucester County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2021
  3. KYLIE TAPIA VS. ABU S. ALAM, MD (L-0694-15, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
  4. SANDRA PENNISE VS. AMERICAN WATER WORKS SERVICE COMPANY, INC. (L-0315-16, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API