T.L. v. Jack Goldberg, M.D.(081135) (Middlesex County and Statewide)
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fernandez-Vina
**220 In this case, we must determine whether plaintiff T.L. is entitled to a new trial because -- without objection from T.L. -- defendant Jack Goldberg, M.D., gave trial testimony inconsistent with his discovery responses.
In this medical malpractice action, T.L. claims Dr. Goldberg committed malpractice by prescribing a medication that she asserts should not be prescribed to individuals, who, like her, have a history of depression. During discovery, Dr. Goldberg claimed that he did not recall relying upon any medical publications when prescribing the medication to T.L. and, more…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Karen K. Johnson v. Roselle Ez Quick, Llc(075044)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- Risko v. Thompson Muller Automotive Group, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
- Hayes v. DelamotteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
- Jackowitz v. LangNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- State v. Santino J. Micelli (070453)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- C.R. v. M.T. (083760) (Gloucester County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2021
- C.R. v. M.T. (083760) (Gloucester County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2021
- KYLIE TAPIA VS. ABU S. ALAM, MD (L-0694-15, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
- SANDRA PENNISE VS. AMERICAN WATER WORKS SERVICE COMPANY, INC. (L-0315-16, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020