Legal Opinion

State v. LaPine

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 6, 1987No. 86-009PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Two years after sentencing for a conviction for sexual assault defendant petitioned for reconsideration of sentence under 13 V.S.A. § 7042, and his petition was denied. We affirm.

Central to defendant’s case is his assertion of changed circumstances, notably his completion of the sexual offender program, visits to a psychiatrist, and participation in work release. The State responds that defendant’s petition in effect seeks to use 13 V.S.A. § 7042 as an alternative to a parole hearing, and that seems to be so. The purpose of reconsideration under § 7042 “is to permit the trial judge to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. TherrienSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HanceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. State v. DerouchieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. State v. PlattSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  4. State v. Dean Jeffrey StearnsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
  5. State v. MartinsenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API