Legal Opinion
Hullum v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided May 24, 1967No. 39563Published
1Opinion
OPINION ON STATE’S MOTION FOR REHEARING
MORRISON, Presiding Judge.
Our opinion on appellant’s motion for rehearing is withdrawn. In addition to what we said originally, we call attention to the following cases: Lenzen v. State, 112 Tex.Cr.R. 297, 16 S.W.2d 234; Horton v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 20 S.W.2d 1110; Smith v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 115 S.W.2d 685; Litchfield v. State, 147 Tex.Cr.R. 201, 179 S.W.2d 507; Bell v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 508, 342 S.W.2d 444; and Newsom v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 372 S.W.2d 681.
Each of the above cases is authority for the rule that any complaint of irregularity in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Pyle v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Francis J. Curran, Francis J. Maguire and Ira F. Jones, Jr. v. State of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- Lenzen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.