Legal Opinion

Dabney v. Stearns

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1913No. 10616PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Irwin, J., entered October 23, 1911, upon findings in favor of the defendants, dismissing consolidated actions to set aside tax sales.

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

Crow, C. J.

Three separate actions were commenced by J. B. Dabney on October 3, 1908, to set aside tax sales and deeds covering city lots in South Aberdeen, Chehalis county. These actions, hereinafter mentioned as a single cause, were consolidated and tried together. Plaintiff appealed from an order of dismissal. On October 26, 1912, the judgment of the trial court was affirmed, Dabney v. Stearns, 70 Wash. *584579, 127 Pac. 192. As no statement of facts was then before us, we said:

“The findings of the trial judge sustain the regularity of the foreclosure proceedings, and support…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Huber v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Baylis v. KerrickWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co. v. AbitzWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Fleming v. StearnsWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Noble v. AuneWashington Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dobesh v. Associated Asphalt Contractors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API