Legal Opinion

Michener v. Michener

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the Common Pleas, No. 1, of Philadelphia County to review a judgment for defendants in á scire facias to renew a mortgage.

1Per curiam

There was no error in rejecting the evidence. It was wholly insufficient to rebut the presumption of payment. It indicates a desire to have the mortgage satisfied of record, but not an admission that it was unpaid. We discover no error in the charge, nor in directing the jury to render a verdict in favor of the defendants. The other specifications of error have no merit.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nichols v. McCallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858