Legal Opinion
E. Plaxton v. Zoning Board of Adjustment and 1903 Spring Garden Associates, LP ~ Appeal of: A. and E. Plaxton
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 9, 2019No. 438 C.D. 2018PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY JUDGE COVEY
Arthur Plaxton (Mr. Plaxton) and Elke Plaxton (Mrs. Plaxton) (collectively, Objectors) appeal, pro se, from the Philadelphia County Common Pleas Court's (trial court) February 22, 2018 order denying Objectors' appeal and affirming the City of Philadelphia (City) Zoning Board of Adjustment's (ZBA) April 25, 2017 decision granting 1903 Spring Garden Associates, LP (Applicant) a use variance to park four vehicles in the rear yard of its property located at 1903 Spring Garden Street, Philadelphia (Property) and a dimensional variance from the Philadelphia Zoning Code's…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Jacobs v. HalloranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Spahn v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Terraciano v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Battersea Ventures, L.P. v. Phila. ZBA and the City of Phila., UCFP LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- In Re: Appeal of City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Solow RI, Inc. & Phila RI, Inc. v. Philadelphia ZB of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019