Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Fontheim

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided June 10, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

The application for reargument is granted and on such reargument my original decision (Matter of Fontheim, 171 Misc. 24) is adhered to. The events which have occurred since the making of the prior decision in no way aid the surrogate in making a final determination of this matter. The administratrix has failed to have the compensation award fixed or estimated as provided in section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Until this is done, it will be extremely difficult, if not impossible, for the surrogate to find what part, if any, of the fund is exempt from the claims of creditors…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of FontheimNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scheer v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API