In re the Estate of Fontheim
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Foley, S.
The application for reargument is granted and on such reargument my original decision (Matter of Fontheim, 171 Misc. 24) is adhered to. The events which have occurred since the making of the prior decision in no way aid the surrogate in making a final determination of this matter. The administratrix has failed to have the compensation award fixed or estimated as provided in section 29 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Until this is done, it will be extremely difficult, if not impossible, for the surrogate to find what part, if any, of the fund is exempt from the claims of creditors…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re the Estate of FontheimNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
3Cited by1 opinion
- Scheer v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1967