Legal Opinion

Doxol Gas of Angier, Inc. v. Howard

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1975No. 7511SC520Published

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Though the question is not raised by either party, we must first determine whether this matter is presently appealable. In support of our determination that this case is properly before this Court, we note the decision of our Supreme Court in Jones v. Thorne, 80 N.C. 72, 75 (1879), wherein the then Chief Justice Smith wrote that “[t]he granting or refusing an order . . . for the appointment of a receiver is not a mere matter of discretion in the judge, and either party dissatisfied with his ruling may have it reviewed.” See also G.S. 1A-1, Rule 62 (a).

Defendant basically…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. . ThorneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. Massey v. CatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API