Legal Opinion

Cox v. Maxwell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1965No. 39216PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

It is petitioner’s contention that his sentence has expired, a full 15 years having passed since he was sentenced. He argues that the parole commission does not have the power to increase his sentence. The parole commission does not increase sentences. In cases such as this it determines how much time an individual has lost while at large as a parole violator and determines when he will be considered again for parole. The sentence of one convicted of a felony has a definite minimum and maximum. Unless granted a final release, one convicted must serve the maximum sentence imposed either by…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Herbert Lee Cox v. E. L. Maxwell, Warden, Ohio PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  2. Hignite v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Ryder v. PeriniOhio Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API