Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. United McGill Corp. v. Hamilton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 30, 1983No. 82AP-977PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorris, J.

Plaintiff, United McGill Corporation, manufactured a pollution control device called an electrostatic precipitator (“ESP”). Defendant, Department of Administrative Services (“DAS”), had the responsibility for preparing contract specifications for the purchase and installation of ESPs at four different state facilities, and for evaluating bids received and supervising the award of contracts. Plaintiff submitted bids for ESPs for each of the four projects, but was not awarded the contracts. Plaintiff brought this action to prevent the award of contracts to the successful bidders after DAS…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Connors v. Ohio Dept. of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tiemann v. University of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Corbett v. Ohio Building AuthorityOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Wilson Bennett, Inc. v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State, Ex Rel. Paul v. Ohio State Racing CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Ohio Valley Mall Co. v. WrayOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API