Legal Opinion
Claim of Krevac v. 310 East 55th Street, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 15, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Acting under and pursuant to the provisions of section 123 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, the State Industrial Board in the interest of justice properly reopened the case, set aside a previous decision disaEowing the claim and made the award appealed from. The evidence amply supported the award and the State Industrial Board had jurisdiction to do so. (Matter of Ingberg v, Zimmerman, 261 N. Y. 551.) *861Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, HefEernan and Foster, JJ.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of Ingberg v. Zimmerman and Norwich Union Indem.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
3Cited by3 opinions
- Claim of Parella v. Harrod Steel Erection Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Claim of Desrosiers v. A. Filkins, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Claim of Palmeri v. E. I. duPont deNemours & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957