Legal Opinion

Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Exhaust Parts, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 2, 1962No. 61-861PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHorton, Judge

Appellant, plaintiff below, seeks review of an adverse final order dismissing its cause and complaint with prejudice.

In 1958, plaintiff brought an action in New Jersey against Aviation Products Corporation (the predecessor of defendant Exhaust Parts Corporation), the defendant Beriant and others. This action culminated in a consent judgment which, in pertinent part, provided:

“ * * * and it appearing that the complaint has been duly filed and served, and that issue has been joined, and it further appearing that this judgment bears the subscribed consent of the defendants;
“IT IS, on this 10th…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lalow v. CodomoSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. Haenal v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1958
  3. United States Rubber Products, Inc. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  4. Transport Rental Systems, Inc. v. Hertz CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance Company v. WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  2. Zero Food Storage, Inc. v. UdellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. DIVISION OF ADMIN., ETC. v. TsalickisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API