Appeal of Allen
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
EROM THE DECREE OE THE ORPHANS5 COURT OE PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. No. 159 January Term 1889, Sup. Ct. On April 11, 1888, tlie account of Stanislaus J. Allen, executor of the will of Daniel Allen, deceased, was called for audit before Ashman, J., when it was made to appear that the testator died testate on August 12, 1884, leaving a widow and eleven children, seven of whom were then minors.
Read the full summary
EROM THE DECREE OE THE ORPHANS5 COURT OE PHILADELPHIA COUNTY. No. 159 January Term 1889, Sup. Ct. On April 11, 1888, tlie account of Stanislaus J. Allen, executor of the will of Daniel Allen, deceased, was called for audit before Ashman, J., when it was made to appear that the testator died testate on August 12, 1884, leaving a widow and eleven children, seven of whom were then minors. By his will, dated February 23, 1881, be provided: “ It is my will and desire that my said executors shall manage and carry on my business as now conducted by me at No. 2644 Frankford Road, in the city of…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam :
The questions involved in this contention were fully consid*549ered and correctly disposed of by tbe court below; and on its opinion the decree complained of is affirmed.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the costs of appellants.
2Cited by5 opinions
- In re Estate of HaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Lusk's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Luers v. LuersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- In Re Estate of LoutsionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Tillett v. MustianSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956