Legal Opinion

Royce v. Ziegfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1927No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order appointing a receiver and enjoining defendants reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The action is one at law and the facts do not entitle the plaintiff to a receiver. (O’Mahoney v. Belmont, 62 N. Y. 133, 142; Central Union Trust Co. v. Northern Insurance Co., 217 App. Div. 482, 487; Mack v. Stanley, 74 id. 145; Civ. Prac. Act, § 974.) Young, Kapper and Carswell, JJ., concur; Lazansky, J., concurs in result; Hagarty, J., dissents.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. O'Mahoney v. . BelmontNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Central Union Trust Co. v. Northern InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eckhaus v. EckhausNew York Supreme Court · 1958