Commonwealth v. Stuyvesant Insurance
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
1. The allegations in the affidavits of the defendant’s agent to the effect that the defendants in the three underlying criminal cases may have been defaulted improperly due to insufficiency of notice were "made on information and belief, as opposed to personal knowledge, [and thus] are to be disregarded in considering a motion for summary judgment.” Shapiro Equip. Corp. v. Morris & Son Constr. Corp., 369 Mass. 968 (1976). See Stetson v. Selectmen of Carlisle, 369 Mass. 755, 763 n.12 (1976). 2. The contention that the courts’ removal of prior defaults by the defendant’s principals in two of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stetson v. Board of Selectmen of CarlisleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Shapiro Equipment Corp. v. Morris & Son Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. THE STUYVESANT INSURANCE CO.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. Town of WeymouthDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1951
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. MocciaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- State v. CauseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983