Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. Laney
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
The question presented by this appeal is whether plaintiff, Sam Milton Laney, proved his right to recover for a confining sickness which was defined in a policy with Great American Reserve Insurance Company as one which “shall totally and continuously disable and necessarily confine the Insured continuously within doors ..” The trial court, without a jury, rendered judgment for Laney. The court of civil appeals affirmed. 488 S.W.2d 481. Great American contends that proof of facts to establish a confining sickness was a condition precedent to Mr. Laney’s right to recover for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United American Insurance Company v. SelbyTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Federal Surety Co. v. WaiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. LaneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Mariner Health GroupUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- Northfield Insurance v. Mariner Post Acute Network, Inc. (In re Mariner Health Group)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- Summit Industrial Construction LLC v. Utica East Ohio Midstream, LLC., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015