Legal Opinion

Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. Laney

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1973No. B-3820PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

The question presented by this appeal is whether plaintiff, Sam Milton Laney, proved his right to recover for a confining sickness which was defined in a policy with Great American Reserve Insurance Company as one which “shall totally and continuously disable and necessarily confine the Insured continuously within doors ..” The trial court, without a jury, rendered judgment for Laney. The court of civil appeals affirmed. 488 S.W.2d 481. Great American contends that proof of facts to establish a confining sickness was a condition precedent to Mr. Laney’s right to recover for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United American Insurance Company v. SelbyTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Federal Surety Co. v. WaiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. LaneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Mariner Health GroupUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2003
  2. Northfield Insurance v. Mariner Post Acute Network, Inc. (In re Mariner Health Group)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2003
  3. Summit Industrial Construction LLC v. Utica East Ohio Midstream, LLC., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API