Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Kerner

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 18, 1958PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Maximilian Moss, S.

The question for the determination of the court is whether the codicil of March 8, 1956 revived the will of November 23, 1954 and a codicil thereto of December 20, 1954 which had been revoked by the will of July 31, 1955.

The proof adduced establishes that the propounded instruments were executed by decedent and subscribing witnesses in accordance with statutory requirements. The republication of decedent’s 1954 will by the 1956 codicil operated as a revocation of the will dated July 31, 1955. The absence of a revocation clause in the 1956 codicil does not change the result…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Probate of the Alleged Last Will & Testament of StickneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of CableAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. In Re the Will of CableNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. In re StickneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  5. In re the Estate of TinkerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of OuterbridgeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API