Legal Opinion · Dissent

Neering v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 7, 1963No. Nos. 31865, 31909, 31959Published

1DissentTerrell, Justice

This proceeding grew out of the following facts: While Roy J. Neering was consulting an attorney on other business, he was shown a list of prospective jurors and was asked if he knew anyone on the list. Neering replied that he knew one, Benoit, whom he thought would make a fair and impartial juror. Said lawyer then advised Neering that he had a case against Winn-Dixie in which he represented a woman who had broken her hip. Later, on his own volition, Neering called Benoit, whom he knew because each of them owned and operated a beauty parlor. Neering then made the following statement to Benoit:

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tyus v. Apalachicola Northern Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
  3. Zirin v. Charles Pfizer & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1961
  4. La Barbera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  5. Chavigny v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API