Creteau v. Foote & Thorne Glass Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Eoote and Thome Glass Company and! others, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on th& 3d day of January, 1899, upon the decision of the court rendered after a trial before the court without a jury at the.Kings County-Trial Term, the parties having waived their right to a jury trial.
1Opinion of the Court
Willard Bartlett, J.:
The plaintiff sties as the assignee of the More-Jonas Glass Company upon four promissory notes of the Eoote &. Thorne Glass-*217Company, received under a compromise agreement with the creditors of the last-named corporation. By this agreement it was provided that each creditor should accept in payment of his claim four promissory notes of the Foote & Thorne Glass Company, payable three, six, nine and twelve months after date, each note representing twenty-live per cent of the amount due to the creditor, and each note to be indorsed by the defendants Thomas W. Hislop and John…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Kirven v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1906
- Manufacturers Trust Co. v. SteinhardtNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Nelson v. Detroit & Security Trust Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Bewley-Darst Coal Co. v. Laurens Gin & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Puro v. PuroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.