Knights of Pythias v. Fishel

This case comes before us by appeal from a judgment sustaining an exception of no cause of ^action. The suit was brought for damages for breach of an agreement to enter into a etmtraet of lease.

It appears from the allegations of the petition, which the exception of no cause of action necessarily admits to be true for the purposes of the exception, that on January 9, 1928, plaintiff entered into an agreement in writing with R. H. Fishel and Clarence Dryer, the defendants in the case, to lease a certain building in Monroe, La., at a monthly consideration of $450 for the first three years and at…