Legal Opinion

Blake v. Stauffer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1960No. 470Published

1Opinion of the CourtGillen, P. J.

Plaintiff, appellant herein, and defendant, appellee herein, will be referred to herein as plaintiff and de fendant, in the same manner as they appeared in the court below. In her original petition plaintiff named Marshall Stauffer, Wayne Blake, and Mary Anderson, d. b. a. Arthur Murray Studios, Charleston, W. Va., parties defendant. In her amended petition only Marshall Stauffer and Mary Anderson, d. b. a. Arthur Murray Studios, were named defendants. Before trial, Marshall Stauffer was dismissed as party to the action on plaintiff’s motion.

The amended petition alleges, in part, as follows:

“N…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brooks v. SentleOhio Court of Appeals · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API