Legal Opinion
In re Buchyn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 9, 2002PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Per Curiam.
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1986. He maintained an office for the practice of law, as a solo practitioner, in the City of Schenectady, Schenectady County.
A Referee’s report sustained charges that respondent inappropriately exerted influence over an elderly woman, Mildred Wells, to his material benefit and misappropriated her funds and property, in violation of the attorney disciplinary rules (see Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 [a] [4], [5], [7]; DR 9-102 [22 NYCRR 1200.3 (a) (4), (5), (7); 1200.46]). The report further found that respondent…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re CapocciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Mantella v. MantellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re Christine D.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- In re SherbuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re SoltysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re BuchynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Lawrence v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- MatterofWatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014