Legal Opinion

Tavarez v. Musse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 5, 2006PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Pearl, J.), dated April 29, 2005, which, after a hearing, inter alia, awarded sole custody of the subject child to the father.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The essential consideration in a custody determination is to promote the best interests of the child (see Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167, 171 [1982]; Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer, 55 NY2d 89, 95 [1982]). “Since the Family Court’s custody determination is largely…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Friederwitzer v. FriederwitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Louise E. S. v. W. Stephen S.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Plaza v. PlazaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Galanos v. GalanosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Martinez v. HyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Gorniok v. Zeledon-MussioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Francis v. CoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. Louis M. v. Administration for Children's ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Matter of Florio v. NivenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API