Legal Opinion

Pentland v. Jacobson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1915No. Docket No. 152PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Luce; Fead, J. Assumpsit by Moses Pentland against John K. Jacobson for the purchase price of certain potatoes. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover for potatoes delivered to the defendant in accordance with a verbal contract entered into by the parties; 288% bushels of potatoes were actually delivered, the value of which was agreed upon to be $151.20. The defendant contested the action brought for this amount because, it is his claim, there was an express warranty as to the condition of the potatoes, whereas, as a fact, they were frozen at the time of delivery. Upon the discovery of the defective condition of the potatoes they were tendered back by the defendant, and the issue thus formed was…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lutz v. Hill-Diesel Engine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Burkett v. Oil Automatic Heating Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People ex rel. Alpha Portland Cement Co. v. Boyes & Blandford Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API