Sullivan v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the District Court of Grayson, Tried below before the Honorable Silas Hare. Appeal from a conviction of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors; penalty, one year imprisonment in the penitentiary. The opinion states the case. On question of insufficiency of indictment: Hardin v. State, 211 S. W. Rep., 233; Salter v. State, 44 Texas Crim. Rep., 591. On question of absence'of defendant: Bell v. State, 32 Texas Crim.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of Grayson, Tried below before the Honorable Silas Hare. Appeal from a conviction of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors; penalty, one year imprisonment in the penitentiary. The opinion states the case. On question of insufficiency of indictment: Hardin v. State, 211 S. W. Rep., 233; Salter v. State, 44 Texas Crim. Rep., 591. On question of absence'of defendant: Bell v. State, 32 Texas Crim. Rep., 436; Derden v. State, 56 id., 396; Hill v. State, 54 id., 646. Cited cases in opinion.
1Opinion
ON REHEARING.
October 19, 1921.
LATTIMORE, Judge.
In his motion for rehearing appellant insists again that the reception of part of the evidence of Sheriff Craig in the absence of the accused, should be held reversible error. The facts appear to be that when the court adjourned at noon he adjourned to meet at 1:30 o’clock P. M., and apparently when that hour was reached proceedings in the trial were resumed, and the witness Craig was called to the stand and asked and answered several questions pertaining to certain jars then in the presence of the jury. Some one called attention to the fact that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Fry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Whitehead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- O'Toole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.