Legal Opinion

Brand v. Manor

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 1955No. Civ. No. 5056Published

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an action for damages. The defendants owned 60 lots of a subdivision containing 160 lots, and planned to build certain houses and eventually to build houses on the remainder of the tract. They entered into some sort of a contract with the plaintiff and his partner for certain sewer work on part or all of this tract. They *760built houses on the 60 lots and the plaintiff and his partner did a certain amount of sewer work, for which they were paid in full. The plaintiff brought this action claiming that the defendants had prevented him from performing the remainder of the contract, and that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Greathouse v. DalenoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. Parnell v. StanfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API