Gorsuch v. Berman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 135, dan. T., 1921, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Delaware Co., March T., 1919, No. 101, dismissing bill in equity, in case of Charles W. Gorsuch v. Frank Berman et ux. Bill in equity for specific performance. Before Johnson, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. The court dismissed the bill. Plaintiff appealed. Error assigned, among others, was aboye decree, quoting it.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Frazer,
Plaintiff appealed from a decree dismissing his bill to compel specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate.
Defendant was the owner of property known as 611 Edgemont Avenue, in the city of Chester, which he placed in the hands of Sweeney & Clyde, real estate brokers, for sale, under the following written agreement *10dated December 3, 1918: “The undersigned hereby authorizes Sweeney & Clyde as the sole and exclusive agents for the sale of property as described on the other side and agree to pay to said agents when a sale or exchange is effected a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Union Trust Co. v. MeansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Smith v. McCannSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Trau v. SloanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
3Cited by6 opinions
- Landskroener v. HenningMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Roskwitalski v. ReissSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Dougherty Distillery Warehouse Co. v. BinenstockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Stewart v. Pen Argyl National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Berks County Trust Co. v. KotzenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.