Legal Opinion

In re Pedro Q.

New York City Family Court

Decided April 14, 1975PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sybil Hart Kooper, S.

A motion has been made to permit the petitioner to use fingerprints taken of the respondent, a 15-year-old juvenile, on the trial of this case. Their use would be limited to comparison with latent fingerprints found at the scene of the crime.

Should this be impermissible, the petitioner requests an order directing the respondent to resubmit to fingerprinting *168under conditions designed to prevent the dissemination of these fingerprints.

The respondent is charged with burglary, criminal trespass, criminal mischief and criminal possession of stolen property— acts which, if…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Leandre C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re Roger EEAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API