Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Coverall North America, Inc.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 8, 1993No. 458, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, Judge.

Appellants, Ronald T. Holmes (“Holmes”) and Holmestar Corporation doing business as Coverall of Baltimore, Inc. (“Holmestar”), filed a complaint in the Circuit Court for Howard County against Appellees, Coverall North America, Inc. (“Coverall”), Shahyar Alex Zayanderoudi also known as Alex Roudi (“Roudi”), and the attorney and other individual officers, directors, and employees of Coverall, alleging violations of the Maryland Franchise Act (Count I), fraud in the inducement (Count II), negligent misrepresentation (Count III), and professional malpractice (Count IV). Coverall…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gold Coast Mall, Inc. v. Larmar Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Crown Oil and Wax Co. of Delaware, Inc. v. Glen Construction Co. of Virginia, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. Frederick Contractors, Inc. v. Bel Pre Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Bel Pre Medical Center, Inc. v. Frederick Contractors, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holmes v. Coverall North America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Ademiluyi v. Pennymac Mortgage Investment Trust Holdings I, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  3. Baltimore County Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 4 v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API