Legal Opinion

Backlund v. Messerli & Kramer, P.A.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 9, 2013No. Civil No. 12-808 (JRT/JJK)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Eric and Shannon Backlund allege that Defendants Messerli & Kramer, P.A. (“M & K”) and M & K’s representative, Steve Doe (“Steve”), violated the *1012Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692' et seq. The Court granted in part Defendants’ previous motion to dismiss. M & K now brings a motion for summary judgment on the remaining claims.

Because the Court finds that there is an issue of material fact regarding M & K’s violation of certain provisions of the FDCPA, the Court will grant in part and deny in part…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ruth v. Triumph PartnershipsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Gburek v. Litton Loan Servicing LPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Clark v. Capital Credit & Collection Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. Nelson v. St. Catherine UniversityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
  3. Olson v. Messerli & Kramer, P.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API