Backlund v. Messerli & Kramer, P.A.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Eric and Shannon Backlund allege that Defendants Messerli & Kramer, P.A. (“M & K”) and M & K’s representative, Steve Doe (“Steve”), violated the *1012Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692' et seq. The Court granted in part Defendants’ previous motion to dismiss. M & K now brings a motion for summary judgment on the remaining claims.
Because the Court finds that there is an issue of material fact regarding M & K’s violation of certain provisions of the FDCPA, the Court will grant in part and deny in part…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ruth v. Triumph PartnershipsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Gburek v. Litton Loan Servicing LPCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Clark v. Capital Credit & Collection Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jackson v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Nelson v. St. Catherine UniversityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
- Olson v. Messerli & Kramer, P.A.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2018