McKenna v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Samuel Nakasian has sought to intervene as a party appellant in this cause. He was not a party to the action in the district court and, although he was fully aware that the cause was pending and of his interest, he made no effort to intervene. A court of appeals may, but only in an exceptional case for imperative reasons, permit intervention where none was sought in the district court—Morin v. City of Stuart, 5th Cir. 1939, 112 F.2d 585. No sufficient reason is shown for allowing intervention in this appeal. The motion will be denied without prejudice to an application by the movant to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Morin v. City of StuartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Brett Allen BurseyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Spring Construction Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Ross R. Barnett and Paul B. Johnson, JrCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Alleghany Corp. v. KirbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Armstrong v. Board Of Education Of BirminghamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.