Legal Opinion

HASTON v. RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 2022No. 2:20-cv-01008Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TIMOTHY HASTON, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C ivil Action No. 20-1008 ) RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P., ) FRONTLINE ASSET STRATEGIES, LLC, ) and JOHN DOES 1-5, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION Presently before the Court is the Renewed Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (“Renewed Motion to Compel Arbitration”) and accompanying Memorandum filed by Defendants Resurgent Capital…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. Guidotti v. Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  4. Kirleis v. Dickie, McCamey & Chilcote, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  5. Century Indemnity Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API