Neil House Hotel Co. v. Board of Revision

Appellant claims that the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is unreasonable and unlawful.

The controversy revolves around two expert witnesses, one on behalf of the appellant and one on behalf of the appellee. Appellant’s claim is' that the Board of Tax Appeals compromised by allowing appellant “half a loaf” instead of accepting as final the lesser valuation by its own expert.

It would serve no useful purpose to quote the corn dieting evidence of these experts both of whom we find to be qualified. Therefore, we shall merely state our conclusions based upon a review of the record including…