Legal Opinion

Kutcher v. Housing Authority of City of Newark

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 19, 1955PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The plaintiff Hyman Kutcher was a tenant of the Housing Authority of the City of Uewark, in Seth Boyden Terrace, a federally-aided low-rent housing project, and the co-plaintiff James Kutcher, Hyman’s son, resided there in his father’s apartment, when on December 18, 1952 the Authority demanded of the plaintiff Hyman Kutcher, by letter, “a certificate that no member of the family occupying” his apartment “is a member of any organization listed by the Attorney General of the United States as subversive,” and set down, it was said, in the form…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Wieman v. UpdegraffSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Randell v. Newark Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  2. Ruffin v. Housing Authority of New OrleansDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
  3. Pittsburgh Housing Authority v. TurnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. First National State Bank v. Commonwealth Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1978
  5. Matter of Plan for Orderly Withdrawal of Twin City Fire Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API