Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Independent School District

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 5, 1929No. 39382PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

— Defendant argues three assignments of error: (1) Overruling defendant’s motion'to strike plaintiff’s reply; (2) overruling defendant’s motion for continuance; (3) sustaining plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant’s rejoinder.

The petition sets out the contract sued upon, alleges per-, formance for part of the term and illegal prevention from teach ing for the rest, plaintiff’s readiness to perform, and salary refused for 32 weeks, — $600. The answer admits the contract and plaintiff’s discharge;'and' affirmatively pleads misconduct with the pupils as justification. The reply, besides denial,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cooley v. BraytonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  2. Johnson v. Farmers InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  3. Courtright v. Consolidated Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Jackson v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. Van Orman v. Spafford, Clarke & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1864

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. NicholsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  2. Chehock v. Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Pfeffer v. CoreySupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. Hiller v. FeltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API