Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. McDaniel

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 15, 2018No. COA17-856Published

1DissentTyson, Judge

The majority's opinion correctly states the applicable standard of review of the trial court's ruling on Defendant's motion to dismiss, yet erroneously concludes the State failed to introduce any competent evidence *16tending to show, and as the jury found, an essential element of the doctrine of recent possession and reverses Defendant's convictions for breaking and entering and larceny. My review and vote concludes no error occurred in Defendant's conviction by the jury or in the judgment entered thereon. I respectfully dissent.

I. Possession of Recently Stolen Goods

Defendant's recent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. MainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. McQueenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  4. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1864
  5. State v. FosterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API