Olympic Corporation v. Societe Generale
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BONSAL, District Judge.
In this diversity action, the third-party defendant Manufacture de Produits Chimiques Protex (“Protex”) moves to dismiss the third-party complaint of Societe Generale (“Societe”), defendant and third-party plaintiff; and Societe, in the event Protex’s motion is granted, moves to dismiss the complaint as against it.
In November 1969, the third-party defendant Protex, a French corporation having an office in Paris and its plant at Chateau Renault, France, purchased 20,000 pounds of resorcinol from plaintiff Olympic Corporation (“Olympic”), a Massachusetts corporation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- De Sairigne v. GouldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1949
- Ciprari v. Servicos Aereos Cruzeiro Do Sul, SA (Cruzeiro)District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Shulman v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Olympic Corp. v. Societe GeneraleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Insurance Corp. of Ireland Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Reyno v. Piper Aircraft Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Walker & Zanger (West Coast) Ltd. v. Stone Design S.A.District Court, C.D. California · 1997
- Olympic Corporation v. Societe Generale, A/s Havkong and Meyer Line, Societe Generale, and Third-Party and Cross v. Manufacture De Produits Chimiques Protex, Third-Party and Cross A/s Havkong (Sued Herein in Its Own Name and as "Meyer Line"), and Third-Party v. Manufacture De Produits Chimiques Protex, Alpina Transports & Affretements S.A., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.