Legal Opinion

Farler v. City of Cabot

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 26, 2006No. CA 05-1212PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Sam Bird, Judge.

Michael Farler appeals a decision of the Worker’s Compensation Commission that denied his claim for multiple injuries sustained in an automobile accident on January 13, 2004. He contends that his claim was compensable because it fell within an exception to the “going and coming rule.” Appellee City of Cabot, who was Farler’s employer at the time of the accident, and appellee Arkansas Municipal League, the City’s insurance carrier, contend that this case does not fall within any such exception; further, they contend that Farler was not in the course of his employment and was…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LemkeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. PetteySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. White v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Pifer v. Single Source TransportationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Collins v. Excel Specialty ProductsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Commercial Metals Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API