Legal Opinion

Born v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided September 10, 1981No. 5095PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal brought by Daniel Born following conviction by a jury of the crime of rape. At issue is the conflicting testimony presented at trial concerning the offense.

On the evening of June 11,1979, M.I. met Daniel Born by shooting a few games of pool with him in the Savoy Bar in Fairbanks. Born was there with a friend, Brad Morton. Around closing time, M.I. agreed to Born’s suggestion that they go snort some coke. Born asked M.I. to ask her friend M.H. if she wanted to come along with Born, Morton and M.I., which M.H. agreed to do. All four had been drinking…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. State v. ChaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Waters v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. WorthamAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Robles v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  5. DeSacia v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1970

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Parrish v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  2. Gant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  3. Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
  4. Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1986
  5. State v. LoganUtah Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API