Legal Opinion · Dissent

CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA v. CITY OF PEMBROKE PINES

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 1, 2017No. 4D14-4815Published

1DissentKlingensmith, J.

Although municipalities typically do not have a duty to supply services to areas outside their boundaries, I recognize that a municipality may be required to supply services outside its boundaries if its conduct expressly manifested the desire or intent to assume such a duty. See Allen’s Creek Props., Inc. v. City of Clearwater, 679 So.2d 1172, 1174-76 (Fla. 1996). However, this exception, which is rooted in the concepts of detrimental reliance and estop-pel, does not apply here. CCA could not reasonably claim detrimental reliance because Pembroke Pines never expressly manifested its desire…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank Markazi v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Irby v. Memorial Healthcare Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. ALLEN'S CREEK PROPERTIES v. ClearwaterSupreme Court of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API