Legal Opinion

United States v. Woolsey

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 19, 1845Published

1Per curiam

(BETTS, District Judge)..

The declaration is demurred to as insufficient in the particulars that it does not make-a ease of which the court can take cognizance and that it does not show that any offence was committed by the defendant.. The action is in debt to recover a penalty of' $320,000 for a .violation of the embargo act of December 22, 1807 [2 Stat. 451], and the-act supplementary thereto of January 0, 1808 [Id. 453]. The declaration avers that the defendant on the 10th day of January, 1808, at the port of the city of Jersey in the-state of New Jersey, to wit, at the city and. port of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. TwentymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Parsons v. BowneNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
  3. B. & J. Q. Aymer v. Gault & M'NamaraNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
  4. Cogswell v. MeechNew York Supreme Court · 1834
  5. Proprietors of Kennebeck Purchase v. CallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1805

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API