People v. Pomales
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Barbara F. Newman, J.
Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 440.46, defendant has filed a motion for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2009 (DLRA) (L 2009, ch 56, part AAA, § 9). The People oppose defendant’s motion asserting that because defendant is a nonincarcerated parolee he does not meet the statutory eligibility requirements for resentence.
The court has reviewed the applicable law and the following documents: (1) defendant’s motion for resentencing; (2) defendant’s affirmation in support of defendant’s motion for resentencing; (3) the People’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. PaulinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. SosaNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Weaver v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. DantonNew York Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. SantanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. SantanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014