Legal Opinion

People v. Pomales

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Barbara F. Newman, J.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 440.46, defendant has filed a motion for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2009 (DLRA) (L 2009, ch 56, part AAA, § 9). The People oppose defendant’s motion asserting that because defendant is a nonincarcerated parolee he does not meet the statutory eligibility requirements for resentence.

The court has reviewed the applicable law and the following documents: (1) defendant’s motion for resentencing; (2) defendant’s affirmation in support of defendant’s motion for resentencing; (3) the People’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. PaulinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. SosaNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Weaver v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. People v. DantonNew York Supreme Court · 2012
  4. People v. SantanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. People v. SantanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API