Legal Opinion

Khelifi v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 25, 1990No. 89-1728PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of trafficking in cocaine. He contends it was error to deny his motion to dismiss on due process grounds. The transaction culminating in his arrest was initiated by an informant performing substantial assistance in order to obtain a reduced sentence in another case. See Hunter v. State, 531 So.2d 239 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).

Here, the informant introduced undercover officers to the appellant’s codefend-ant, Boutelle. The informant advised the officers that Boutelle was interested in buying drugs. The police knew nothing about the background of either the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GlossonSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Hunter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. State v. RuizDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Perez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Herndon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Jamarillo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Henry v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (Duval County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API